|
Best of Pot-Tv Vol 2 CD/VHS
only at the
CC Store!
|
|
|
|
 |  |
|
High Society: Mikki Norris
High Society with David Malmo-Levine
|
|
| Running Time: |
37 min |
| Date Entered: |
28 Aug 2001 |
| Viewer Rating: |
8.52 (18 votes) |
| Number of Views: |
907 |
|
|
David Malmo-Levine talks with Mikki Morris, co-aithor of "Shattered Lives: Portraits from America's Drug war" and "Human Rights and the US Drug War". Mikki also brings Pot TV the excellent documentary "Tulia, Texas- Scenes from the Drug War. Pot-TV
More shows from High Society
|
Re: High Society: Mikki Norris
davidmalmolevine,
Sat Apr 5 22:31:11 2003
April 2, 2003
Texas Court Acts to Clear 38, Almost All Black, in Drug Case
Simon Romero and Adam Liptak
New York Times
TULIA, Tex., April 1 — Conceding that they had made a catastrophic mistake in relying solely on the uncorroborated testimony of an undercover officer, prosecutors moved today to overturn the convictions of 38 people, almost all of them black, who were caught in a series of drug arrests in 1999 that tore this town apart.
A judge agreed with the prosecutors, and defense lawyers, that the Texas courts should vacate every conviction arising from the drug sting, including those in which the defendants pleaded guilty.
The extraordinary turnabout followed hearings here last month in which the undercover officer, Thomas Coleman, and many other witnesses testified about his troubled law enforcement career, unorthodox methods, pervasive errors, combustible temperament and apparent racism.
But the drug prosecutions were fueled by more than one unreliable officer, defense lawyers said. The prosecutions were, these lawyers said, the consequence of poisonous small-town race relations, a misguided desire to claim victories at any cost in the war on drugs and a legal system in which poor defendants did not have a fighting chance against thin but confident testimony from a single police officer.
"It is established by all parties and approved by the court that Tom Coleman is simply not a credible witness under oath," Ron Chapman, a retired state court judge who presided over the hearings, said from the bench today. Judge Chapman said he would recommend that a higher court overturn the convictions of everyone convicted in the sting. In the meantime, the 16 people still in prison will remain there.
Roderique S. Hobson Jr., a lawyer in Lubbock who was recently brought in as a special prosecutor on the case, said, "What we've seen here is the beginning of a vindication of the system."
Throughout this town of 5,000 perched on the flatlands of the Texas panhandle between Amarillo and Lubbock, there were displays of surprise and gratification after today's developments. Outside the courthouse, Pattie Brookins, the mother of Freddie Brookins Jr., one of the four men challenging their convictions on drug charges in last month's hearings, could not stop weeping as she stood in front of the jail where her son was still being held.
"It's been a long time coming," Ms. Brookins said. "I guess this is what satisfaction feels like."
Swisher County, of which Tulia is the seat, also agreed to pay $250,000 to the 38 defendants. Defense lawyers said the money would be allocated based largely on how long the defendants spent in prison. In exchange, the defendants gave up the right to file civil suits against the county and its employees, including the sheriff here, Larry Stewart, and the original prosecutor, Terry D. McEachern. The agreement probably precludes suits against Mr. Coleman.
Forty-six people were arrested in the drug sweep, but several of the cases were dismissed as Mr. Coleman's evidence unraveled.
Seven of the 38 who were convicted based on his accusations went to trial, receiving sentences of at least 20 years. Fourteen other people received prison sentences after pleading guilty. Twelve pleaded guilty and were sentenced to probation or had earlier probation revoked. Two people pleaded guilty to misdemeanors and were fined.
Three had cases dismissed but had probation revoked in other counties while the Tulia charges were pending.
Defense lawyers said they might pursue suits against others, including the Panhandle Regional Narcotics Trafficking Task Force, the federally financed consortium of 26 Texas counties that helped hire and supervise Mr. Coleman.
Judge Chapman granted a request by Mr. McEachern and two other local prosecutors that they be allowed to withdraw from the cases based on what he described as Mr. Coleman's apparent perjury. Mr. Hobson, the new special prosecutor, made a similar request, but Judge Chapman asked him to continue to represent the state in the cases.
Sheriff Stewart, who hired Mr. Coleman in January 1998 as an undercover officer, did not allow reporters to visit the four inmates in the county jail today but in telephone interviews the men reflected on their experience with Swisher County's legal system.
None of the four men said that they planned to stay in Tulia, which has a small African-American population of about 400.
Joseph Moore, 60, a hog farmer who Mr. Coleman said was the kingpin of cocaine trafficking in Tulia, said he hoped to move to a small town nearby in New Mexico or Oklahoma where he hoped to get his health in order.
"The last 45 months in prison have been hell for me," Mr. Moore said. "My diabetes started to act up and I almost died in jail. I don't know if anyone can understand what it means to almost die alone, incarcerated by mistake."
Christopher Jackson, who turns 31 on Wednesday, said he hoped to pass a high school graduation equivalency test and planned to start his own welding business. "This is a very blessed moment," Mr. Jackson said.
Jason Williams, 24, said he was planning to study business management to eventually open his own electronics store. "I want to make this dusty little town into just a memory," Mr. Williams said.
Sheriff Stewart said in a statement, "The agreement reached among the parties involved is not about guilt or innocence but is intended to end the controversy that surrounds these cases."
For a small community that had nearly a tenth of its black population incarcerated on drug-related charges, the drug sting masterminded by Mr. Coleman has left an enduring mark.
Tynisha Winkfield, interviewed at a Pizza Hut restaurant where people in the courtroom repaired to celebrate the settlement over lunch, said her boyfriend, Jerrod Ervine, and uncle, Billie Wafer, had been jailed and subsequently released as a result of the sting.
Another uncle, Kenneth Powell, is one of 16 people still in prison because of the sting or as a result of probation violations related to drug charges originating from Mr. Coleman's undercover operation.
"Kids have lost parents and families have lost money because of this," said Ms. Winkfield, who works as a bartender at the Country Club, a bar on the outskirts of this dry town whose clientele is entirely white.
Lawyers for the defendants, from Amarillo, New York and Washington, expressed satisfaction at today's developments and dismay at how long the process had taken.
"It came later than it should have come, but at least it came," said Mitchell E. Zamoff, a lawyer with Hogan & Hartson in Washington. That firm and Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, also in Washington, represented two of the defendants. Others were represented by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and Jeff Blackburn, a lawyer in Amarillo.
Mr. Coleman testified last month that although most of the supposed drug transactions were in public places, he did not wear a recording device, arrange for video surveillance, ask anyone to accompany him, ask anyone to observe the deals or fingerprint the plastic bags containing the drugs. He worked alone and did not tape record his drug buys. No drugs, weapons or large sums of cash were found when 46 people, more than 10 percent of Tulia's black population, were arrested early in the morning on July 23, 1999.
Mr. Coleman also testified that he made routine use of the most charged of racial epithets.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest court for criminal matters, is not required to accept the parties' request or Judge Chapman's recommendation.
When the appeals court ordered last month's hearings, it indicated that much will turn on whether there was other evidence of guilt and whether defense lawyers were told enough about Mr. Coleman by prosecutors to try to discredit his testimony at their client's trials in late 1999 and early 2000.
Defense lawyers will spend the next few weeks gathering further information on those points. They will submit the information, as proposed findings of fact, to Judge Chapman for his consideration and approval. The findings will serve as the basis for Judge Chapman's recommendation to the appeals court.
Legal experts cautioned that the appeals court can be unpredictable and does not always accept even requests joined in by all parties.
The appeals court could reject Judge Chapman's recommendation in some or all of the cases, overturn the convictions outright or order new trials. But given their concessions about Mr. Coleman today, prosecutors are unlikely to pursue retrials even if the appeals court allows them.
Mr. Coleman, who was not at the courthouse today, could not be reached for comment. His phone number is unlisted. Mr. McEachern, the original prosecutor, did not respond to a message seeking comment.
At a small housing project behind the Sales Barn, a feedlot where auctions of livestock from surrounding ranches are held each week, talk about financial awards or the legal complexities of the settlement seemed far away. Tina S. Yarlrough, a 38-year-old housekeeper, wondered if life in Tulia could get back to normal.
"It used to be pretty calm around here," Ms. Yarlrough said as she sat on her porch swapping jokes with her neighbors. "Then it got to the point where you couldn't have a boyfriend or a girlfriend with so many people locked up. The only ones left were your kinfolk."
nytimes.com
Wednesday April 2, 2003
Prosecutors Won't Retry Drug Convictions
Associated Press
TULIA, Texas (AP) - Prosecutors said 38 defendants arrested in a controversial 1999 drug sting won't be retried after a judge ruled their convictions were based on questionable testimony from a single undercover agent accused of racial prejudice.
Hours after retired state district Judge Ron Chapman urged the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to grant new trials for the defendants, a special prosecutor vowed Tuesday to dismiss the cases if they were sent back.
``We'll dismiss them,'' said Rod Hobson, a special prosecutor assigned to the case that has spurred probes by the Justice Department and the Texas attorney general. ``It would be foolish for us to go forward.''
The cases involved an 18-month undercover investigation by former sheriff's officer Tom Coleman. Most of the defendants he arrested in this predominantly white Texas Panhandle town were black.
Their arrests on charges of possessing and selling cocaine hinged on Coleman's testimony. He worked alone and used no audio or video surveillance.
But no drugs were ever found during the arrests and little or no corroborating evidence was introduced at trial. The Texas American Civil Liberties Union suggested discrimination was behind the arrests and that they were intended to eliminate Tulia's black population. Coleman is white.
The appeals court had ordered a hearing to review evidence against four of the defendants to determine if the men were convicted solely on Coleman's word and whether prosecutors failed to turn over information from Coleman's background that may have cast doubt on his testimony.
``It is stipulated by all parties and approved by the court that Tom Coleman is simply not a credible witness under oath,'' Chapman announced in the Swisher County courtroom Tuesday.
Jeff Blackburn, an attorney representing two of the four men whose arrests were examined in the hearing, predicted Chapman's recommendation would carry considerable weight with the appellate court.
``This is wonderful news, though nothing is final as of yet,'' said Vanita Gupta, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund. ``But we are very pleased that Tom Coleman's word can't be the basis of any standing conviction.''
Mattie White, who had four children arrested by Coleman, was ecstatic. ``That's the best step I ever heard,'' she said. ``We've been praying for this for four years, and we haven't ever given up.''
Swisher County commissioners unanimously approved a $250,000 payment to the defendants. The amount will be distributed based on how much time each person was imprisoned, defense attorney Ted Killory told the commissioners.
In all, 46 people were arrested, 39 of them black, during Coleman's undercover sting. Thirteen are still in prison and others served time or were sentenced to probation.
Coleman was the main witness during the hearing, and testified that he stood by his investigations. He blamed work-related problems on marital trouble and denied allegations that he was a thief and a liar, but contradicted himself several times on the stand.
Coleman came to Tulia, midway between Lubbock and Amarillo, in late 1997. He had been a Pecos police officer and Cochran County sheriff's deputy, though he left that job in 1996 after he was charged with theft and abuse of power; those charges were dropped after he paid nearly $7,000 in restitution.
He worked as a welder before being hired in Tulia in 1998 as an undercover drug agent for the Swisher County Sheriff's Department.
On July 23, 1999, the suspects Coleman identified were pulled from their beds and paraded, still in their nightclothes, across the courthouse lawn in front of television cameras. The Texas Narcotic Control Program later named Coleman ``Outstanding Lawman of the Year.''
One of his supervisors with the Panhandle Regional Narcotics Trafficking Task Force, Lt. Michael Amos, testified that Coleman had ``an exceptional talent at being an undercover officer.''
But Amos acknowledged that Coleman's previous employers had told his staff Coleman was unprofessional, needed constant supervision, was a discipline problem and tended to run to his mother for help.
Coleman no longer works in law enforcement or for Swisher County.
Swisher County Sheriff Larry Stewart said that the judge's recommendation helps bring closure to years of dispute. It was still unknown when the appeals court will issue its ruling on Chapman's recommendation.
``The agreement reached among the parties involved is not about guilt or innocence but is intended to end the controversy that has surrounded these cases,'' Stewart said in a statement.
newsday
discuss this show in the CC forums >
|
Check out www.kunstler.org www.feda.org www.potpride.com www.famm.org www.drugsense.org
Sponsored by www.emeryseeds.com www.bcmarijuanaparty.ca
|
