|
|
| | |
|
Prince of Pot: US Election 2004 Special
Prince of Pot with Pot-TV
|
|
| Running Time: |
8 min |
| Date Entered: |
29 Oct 2004 |
| Viewer Rating: |
9.30 (29 votes) |
| Number of Views: |
2417 |
|
|
Marc shares his apocalyptic fears about George W. Bush and encourages all of Pot TV's American friends to get out there and vote John Kerry on November 2nd, 2004. Pot-TV
More shows from Prince of Pot
|
Re: Prince of Pot: US Election 2004 Special
JRRTOKIN3,
Sat Oct 30 20:47:15 2004
Marc goes together with the blue (green?) screen as naturally as "Red Sox" goes together with "World Series champs."
About time! Marc has a long way to go to catch up to Loretta's masterful use of the screen, but at least he's aware of its existence now. A leap in the right direction, after years of Marc's face lit like a cadaver on his usual appearances on Pot TV.
Re: Prince of Pot: US Election 2004 Special
liberty,
Sat Oct 30 19:51:24 2004
I will never vote for what I don’t want, I have to live with myself not Marc Emery. If you can live with yourself and want to endorse more big government go ahead. Democrats are as much politicians as Republicans are, so they both have always catered to the most political influence where ever that happens to be at the time, the rhetoric they use is the only difference.
I think you can thank Slick Willie for 911, because 500,000 died Iraqi children was the straw that broke the camel’s back as far as, suicide recruitment, organization, and financing is concerned for a little Republicrat “its worth it” payback. This is something the current Bush has yet to accomplish.
As far as where the pinnacle is, it has always been in the seat of the current King.
Democrats and Republicans do the same thing, the only difference is in how they describe it to you. If you listen to Marc or them you would think they are doing different things, but underneath they are not. I think Marc has been indoctrinated into the same rhetoric he is criticizing. Politicians can only do what they can get away with at the time that is the only precedent of the so-called ever increasing pinnacle, you can't blame that on the Bushman.
In the United States government has grown faster with Republicans in power because Democrats think government should do everything, so there is nothing to stop them. Where as when Democrats are in power the Republicans will pull out their insincere unconstitutional arguments about containing government, so you see more gridlock.
One last note, nobody in the world except for the brainwashed masses and the people in power really want either one of these parties to have free rein.
IMO, in two years time the military draft will be reinstated in the United States no matter which politician here is crown King.
Re: Prince of Pot: US Election 2004 Special (pottv
Dalamar49,
Sat Oct 30 17:40:09 2004
Ist dissapointing to read so many people dismissing anti-Kerry arguements by stating how bad Bush is.
Its obvious that Bush is horrible, but so is Kerry. Everything Bush has screwed up (like the Iraq War, the PATRIOT ACT), Kerry is on record of supporting too.
Even during the second presidential debate Kerry admitted that he supported the PATRIOT Act. Shouldn't that be proof that he opposes civil liberties?
Kerry is also on record, saying that he still supports the war in Iraq. If you oppose that war, why would you vote for him? Because Kerry would run the war differently, because he would include other nations in the pillaging and looting of Iraqi oil.
Wouldn't it make more sense to vote for candidates who support both peace and civil liberties. Both David Cobb of the Green Party and Michael Badnarik of the Libertarian Party oppose the Iraq War and the PATRIOT Act. If you agree with those positions maybe you should vote for them instead. discuss this show in the CC forums >
|
Check out www.bcmarijuanaparty.ca
|
